Satish Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.291 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12773 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Satish Kumar Singh, son of Umashankar Singh, resident of Village Paharpur, Police Station Kuchaikot, District Gopalganj. 2.

Sunil Kumar Singh, Son of Umashankar Singh, resident of Village Paharpur, Police Station Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj. 3.

Tripurari Singh, son of Pratap Narain Singh, resident of Village Naraha, Police Station Majorganj, District Sitamarhi. 4.

Satrunjay Singh, son of Indradeo Singh, resident of Village Salaha, Police Station Chautarva, Bagaha, District West Champaran. 5.

Jagat Jitendra Shahi, son of Manik Sahi, resident of Village Pipara, Deorar, Police Station Deoria, Uttar Pradesh.

... ... Appellants.

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Collector, West Champaran at Bettiah.

3.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Bagaha District West Champaran, Bettiah. 4.

The Superintendent of Police, District West Champaran, Bettiah. 5.

The Anchal Adhikari, Bagaha Block 1, District West Champaran, Bettiah. 6.

The Officer-in-Charge, Chautarva Police Station District West Champaran at Bettiah.

... ... Respondents.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellants :

Mr. Zainul Abedin, Advocate.

For the Respondents :

Mr. Md.Khurshid Alam, AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH) 26-11-2019 The instant Letters Patent Appeal has been filed by the appellants challenging the order dated 31.01.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in C.W.J.C. No.12773 of 2016, by which he has remitted the case of the appellants before the Bihar

Patna High Court L.P.A No.291 of 2019(9) dt.26-11-2019 2/2 Land Tribunal for adjudication.

At the outset, Mr. Zainul Abedin, learned counsel for the appellants seeks leave to withdraw the present memo of appeal in order to comply with the order passed by the learned Single Judge.

Learned counsel for the State does not oppose the prayer of the learned counsel for the appellants. Leave is granted.

Accordingly, this memo of appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) (Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J.) Trivedi/- U