Naresh Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18712 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -390 Year- 2014 Thana -VAISHALI District- VAISHALI (HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Naresh Ram, Son of Bhola Ram.

2. Mina Devi, wife of Naresh Ram.

Both are resident of village - Vaishali, P.S.- Vaishali, District - Vaishali. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 11-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 390 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 467 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is contended that there is no truth behind the allegation made in the FIR. As a matter of fact, the informant has asked the petitioner no. 1 to arrange for the employment and after meeting with the authority of the institution on 06.06.2012 and 18.06.2013 respectively the said institution

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18712 of 2015 (2) dt.11-09-2015 2 / 3 issued appointment letters to the two sons of informant and they started teaching. After teaching for 3-4 months the petitioners and other did not get their salary. On query, the petitioner no. 1 learnt that the institution which has issued appointment letter is forged and fictitious institution and accordingly, the petitioner no. 1 wrote a letter to the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali and also filed an informatory petition vide informatory petition No. 65 of 2014 before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. He has submitted that according to the prosecution case, the petitioners who are husband and wife came to the informant and stated that petitioner no.

1 has got employment as a teacher in the Sanskriti Bal Shiksha Pariyojana and he would be getting Rs. 4,000/- per month as salary. The petitioner no. 1 has also stated that he has got employment by spending money and if the informant's son and his brother want employment they have to spent Rs. 60,000/-.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18712 of 2015 (2) dt.11-09-2015 3 / 3 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Vaishali P.S. Case No. 390 of 2014 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T