Saheb Ansari v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18460 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1834 Year- 2014 Thana -WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- WESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Saheb Ansari Son of Mukhtar Ansari resident of Village- Bahuarwa, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Rukhsar Khatoon Wife of Saheb Ansari and daughter of Samim Ansari resident of Village- Bahuarwa, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate.
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2015 Heard both sides.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No. 1834-C of 2014, corresponding to Trial No. 1988-C of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is the husband of the complainant and he is ready to keep his wife. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that the complainant is also ready to live with her husband provided her husband gives undertaking to keep her properly.
Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner above named is directed to surrender in the court below within four
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18460 of 2015 (2) dt.15-05-2015 2/2 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order and the court below shall enlarge the petitioner on provisional bail, after issuing notice to the informant and the court below also take undertaking from the petitioner that he shall keep the complainant properly, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Complaint Case No. 1834-C of 2014, corresponding to Trial No. 1988-C of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and the court below shall make efforts for reconciliation between the husband and the wife. If the dispute is resolved, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner shall be confirmed and if the dispute does not resolve the court below shall pass order in accordance with law on the provisional bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T