← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7660/2016disposed

Sunil Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-10-13Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7660 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Sunil Kumar son of Late Birendra Kumar, resident of Saristabad, West Gardanibagh, P.O.- Anishabad, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna. 2.

Shakuntla Devi W/o Late Birendra Kumar, resident of Saristabad, West Gardanibagh, P.O.- Anishabad, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna. Devendra Prasad, son of Late Brijmohan Prasad, resident of Water Board Quarter, Water Tower, Road No.4, Near Devi Asthan, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna.

4.

Baliram Singh son of Late Bansh Lal Singh, resident of Village- Muradpur Narkateya, P.O.- Babhangama, P.S.- Majourganj, District- Sitamarhi. 5.

Lal Babu Rai son of Late Tapeshwar Ray, resident of Village- SAbalpur Pachhiyari Tola, P.O.- Sabalpur, P.S.- Sonepur, District- Saran. 6.

Phulwati Devi W/o Late Ram Eqbal Ray, resident of Rajendra Nagar Road No.1, Pani Tanki, P.O.- Rajendra Nagar, P.S.- Kadam Kuan, District- Patna. 7.

Yogendra Prasad Singh, son of Late Bhagwan Das Yadav resident of Village- Badi Pahadhi, P.O.- Pahadhi, P.s.- Agam Kuan, District- Patna. 8.

Basanti Devi W/o Late Baban Prasad resident of Jagat Narayan Road, P.O.P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna.

9.

Suresh Prasad, son of Late Hari Narayan Prasad, resident of Water Tower, Quarter No.16, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna. 10.

Ramcharitar Yadav, son of Late Ram Lal Yadav, resident of Water Tower, Road No.2, Patna Water Board Campus, Near Patna High Court, P.O.- G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna.

11.

Prahlad Prasad, son of Sant Lal, resident of Chowk Shikarpur, P.O.- Begampur Patna City, P.S.- Chowk, District- Patna. 12.

Shankar Pandit, son of Late Hira Lal Pandit, resident of Kurjee Kotheyam, Vikash Nagar, Road No.12, P.O.- Sadakat Ashram, P.S.- Digha, DistrictPatna. 13.

Balmiki Prasad, son of Late Jagdeo Prasad, resident of Village- Mohaddipur, P.O.- Bind, P.S.- Bind, District- Nalanda.

14.

Ramadhar Thakur, son of Late Narayan Thakur, resident of Boring Road, A.N. College, Digha Pani Tanki, Block No.2, Quarter No.3, P.O.- Patliputra, P.S.- S.K. Puri, District- Patna.

15.

Ajay Kumar, son of Late Parikha Paswan, resident of Raod No.4, Devi Asthan Near Patna High Court, East Gate, P.O. G.P.O., P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Patna Municipal Corporation through its Municipal Commissioner, Maurya Lok, P.R.D.A., Patna.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7660 of 2016(2) dt.13-10-2023 2/3 The Additional Municipal Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

4.

The Chief Account Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna. null null 5.

The Respectively Executive Officer of Circle, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ramendra Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Pandey Sanjay Sahay, SC-31 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 13-10-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/ directions for commanding and directing the Respondent authority to pay the enhance revised scale differences which is effected from 01.04.1997 to till 31.10.2004 and along with Dearness Allowances differences also remained dues from 01.07.91 to till 31.10.2004. It is withheld by the Respondent authorities without any reasonable ground as well as the further prayer is for the interest on the basis of admissible rate on the entire differences arrears of the enhance revise scale due to delay payment

Patna High Court CWJC No.7660 of 2016(2) dt.13-10-2023 3/3 by virtue of negligence and whimsically attitude adopted by the concerned authorities and have taken pretext of L.P.A. No. 960/2007 and hence in this regard, there is no concern of alleged L.P.A. in question for payment of said arrear."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the respondent authorities for redressal of their subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty, so sought, is granted. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U