← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24518/2021bail granted

Md. Rijawan @ Md. Rizvaan v. The State Of Bihar

2021-07-05Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24518 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2021 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Md. Rijawan @ Md. Rizvaan, aged about 26 years (Male), Son Of Nanhaki Madari, R/O Village- Ladaura, P.S.- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mrs. Pushpa Sinha.1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State through virtual mode.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 1100 liters wine is said to have been recovered from the Tata 407 vehicle in question.

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that total 1100 liters wine is recovered from the Tata 407 vehicle in question. The said vehicle in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24518 of 2021(2) dt.05-07-2021 2/3 question does not belong to the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case on the basis of disclosure made by local Chaukidar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of the learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Samastipur, in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 21 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24518 of 2021(2) dt.05-07-2021 3/3 eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T