Lalsa Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20123 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2023 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Lalsa Devi Wife Of Dharamveer Kumar Singh Resident Of Village- Shivpur Halt, Ps- Bikramganj, Distt- Rohtas 2.

Mukesh Kumar Singh @ Mukesh Kumar Son Of Raju Yadav Resident Of Village- Shivpur Halt, Ps- Bikramganj, Distt- Rohtas 3.

Ram Nath Yadav @ Ram Nath Singh Son Of Ram Sewak Singh Resident Of Village- Shivpur Halt, Ps- Bikramganj, Distt- Rohtas 4.

Hira Yadav Son Of Ram Nath Singh @ Ram Nath Yadav Resident Of Village- Shivpur Halt, Ps- Bikramganj, Distt- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-04-2024 Heard Mr. Dhaneshwar Pd. Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Dilip Kumar No. 1, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners are said to have sold the land of the informant to one Lalsa Devi (petitioner no. 1).

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner no. 1 is the purchaser of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20123 of 2024(3) dt.18-04-2024 2/2 the said land and petitioner nos. 2, 3 and 4 are the witness and identifier of the sale deed. He submits that there is civil dispute between the parties. He submits that after purchased the piece of the land, the said land has been mutated in favour of the petitioner no. 1 and revenue receipts has also been issued in favour of the petitioner. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 47 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T