← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16324/2024bail granted

Binod Kumar @ Sardar Jee v. The State Of Bihar

2024-03-18Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16324 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-485 Year-2023 Thana- KONCH District- Gaya ====================================================== Binod Kumar @ Sardar Jee, age about 40 years, Gender-Male, Son of Lakhandeo Yadav, Resident of Village- Dhanchui, P.S. Konch, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dashrath Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 18-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Konch PS Case No. 485 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown accused persons stop the bike of the informant, assaulted him and looted his bike, mobile and cash of Rs. 23,000/- and fled away from the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and no any incriminating articles have been recovered

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16324 of 2024(3) dt.18-03-2024 2/3 from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has been made accused only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Pramod Das. Petitioner was neither arrested at the spot nor any Test Identification Parade has been conducted till date. Petitioner is in custody since 24.11.2023.

5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail.

6. From perusal of the FIR and the impugned order of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-II, Gaya dated 23.01.2024, it appears that petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name surfaced only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Pramod Das. As submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that investigation has already been completed, chargesheet has already been submitted in this case before the learned Magistrate and no TIP conducted till date, accordingly the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Gaya in connection with Konch PS Case No. 485 of 2023.

7. The trial Court is directed to conclude the proceeding of framing of charge according to law within a

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16324 of 2024(3) dt.18-03-2024 3/3 period of 15 (fifteen days) from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, it is made clear that if the charge-sheet has not been submitted then the petitioner shall be released on bail on above conditions and he shall be present physically on each and every date before the Trial Court till conclusion of the proceeding of framing of charge.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr.

U T