Ganesh Kumar @ Satyam @ Satyam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19634 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-561 Year-2023 Thana- CHANDAUTI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Ganesh Kumar @ Satyam @ Satyam Kumar S/o Shiv Kumar Yadav R/o Village - Agraila, P.S - Chandauti, District - Gaya 2.
Kartik Kumar @ Shivam @ Shivam Kumar S/o Shiv Kumar Yadav R/o Village - Agraila, P.S - Chandauti, District - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-04-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, abused and assaulted informant and his family members. Petitioner No. 1, namely Ganesh Kumar, is alleged to have assaulted uncle of informant, namely Yogendra Kumar, by means of Sabbal (crowbar) and Petitioner No. 2, namely Kartik
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19634 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 2/3 Kumar, is alleged to have assaulted with iron rod.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are co-villagers and due to petty dispute, a simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Gaya in connection with Chandauti P.S. Case No. 561 of 2023, subject to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19634 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 3/3 condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T