Ramita Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3124 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Ramita Devi wife of Anil Kumar Ram, Resident of Village:- Khalwa Tola, Harizan Toli, P.S:- Phulwaria, District:- Gopalganj.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Collector of the District- Gopalganj.

2. The Child Development Project Officer, Phulwaria P.S:- Phulwaria, District:- Gopalganj.

3. The District Programme Officer, Gopalganj. (District Land development Branches, Collectorate, Gopalganj.) .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. GP15- SHARAD KUMAR SINHA =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-04-2015 *************** 16.04.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This writ application is dismissed with an observation that the petitioner has full remedy available against the order of the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj.

The Court has gone through the affidavit filed on behalf of the respondents. The confusion, which was sought to be created by the petitioner with regard to the two orders are now put to rest, after going through the affidavit of the District Magistrate and the materials brought on record. Effort by the petitioner to establish the bona fide of the centre being run from her house is not for her to decide, it is the authorities, who have to

Patna High Court CWJC No.3124 of 2015 dt.16-04-2015 2/2 take a decision as to where the centre must run, because it is for the benefit of the beneficiaries and not for the petitioner.

Writ application is dismissed with observation as above.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/- U