Vikramaditya Bharati v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4820 of 2020 ======================================================
1. Champa Devi, wife of late Vikramaditya Bharati
2. Sampurnanand Bharti, son of late Vikramaditya Bharti.
3. Vivekanand Bharti, son of late Vikramaditya Bharti.
4. Sangita Goshwami daughter of Late Vikramaditya Bharti all Resident of Village- Anand Nagar, West of P.H.E.D. Tower, P.O. and P.S.- Siwan Town and District- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.
3.
Jai Prakash University, Chapra, through its Registrar. 4.
The Vice- Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra. 5.
The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra. 6.
B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur through its Registrar. 7.
The Vice- Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. 8.
The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shubh Narain Singh, Adv.
For the State Mr. Sanjay Kumar, AC to GP-23 For the BRA University Mr. Indrehesh Kumar, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-04-2024 Re: I.A. No. 01 of 2022 This interlocutory application has been filed for substitution of legal heir of petitioner, who died on 25.09.2020, leaving behind his wife Champa Devi and two sons and one daughter, namely, Sampurnanand Bharti, Vikekanand Bharti and Sangita Goshwami.
2. The present interlocutory application being formal in nature, is not opposed, hence is allowed. Re: C.W.J.C. No. 4820 of 2020
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners,
Patna High Court CWJC No.4820 of 2020(3) dt.01-04-2024 2/2 learned counsel for the University and learned counsel for the State.
4. At the very outset, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach before the respondent no. 5, the Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra for redressal of their grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
5. It is needless to state that in case appropriate representation is filed, within a period of four weeks from today, the respondent no. 5 shall dispose of the same after affording opportunity of personal hearing or through their counsel by passing a reasoned and a speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks, thereafter.
6. Respondent no. 5 shall be solely liable for noncompliance of this order within the stipulated period.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioners.
8. The writ petition stands disposed of on the aforesaid terms.
devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U