Ajay Uppal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4206 of 2022 ====================================================== Ajay Uppal Son of Late Guru Prasad Uppal Resident at - New Area, Kadamkuan, Near Justice Raj Kishore path, Kadamkuan, Post Office - Kadamkuan, Police Station - Kadamkuan, District- Patna. Presently working on deputation as In Charge Cashier in Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Head of Directors, Health Services, Bihar at Patna. 4.

The Superintendent, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. 5.

The Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lal Babu Keshari, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Birju Prasad (Gp13) Mr.Ravi Kumar, AC to GP-13 Mr.Ajit Anand, AC to GP-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 23-01-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application for issuance of an appropriate writs, orders and directions against the respondents for commanding the respondents to quash the Show Cause notice as contained in Annexure 5. issued by Respondent No. 3 vide Memo No.117 dated 17.02.2022 against the petitioner, whereby and where under the petitioner was directed to file ShowCause within 3 days before the concerned Authority as to why the Departmental

Patna High Court CWJC No.4206 of 2022(2) dt.23-01-2024 2/2 Proceeding would not be initiated under the Bihar, Government Servant (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 against him regarding alleged charges of misappropriation and be pleased to direct the respondents not to take any coercive action against the petitioner during pendency of the writ petition and your Lordships may be pleased to pass any suitable and appropriate order as it deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case."

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent-authorities for redressal of his subsisting grievances, if any. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The present writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U