Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21260/2017bail granted

Pramod Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-07Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21260 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -66 Year- 2016 Thana -THAKURGANJ District- KISANGANJ ====================================================== Pramod Mahto, son of late Arjun Mahto, resident of Village- Farabari, Police Station- Tahkurganj, in the district of Kishanganj. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Thakurganj P.S.Case No. 66 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that petitioner has been arrested while stealing motorcycle of the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that false and concocted case has been filed against the petitioner and he is in custody for the last one year having no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21260 of 2017 (3) dt.07-07-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Firoz Akram, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Kishanganj, in connection with Thakurganj P.S.Case No. 66 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his family member having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U