Rupesh Kumar Singh @ Shiva v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32469 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -187 Year- 2016 Thana -BIKRAMGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Rupesh Kumar Singh @ Shiva, Son of Kamlesh Singh, resident of Village- Katariya, P.S.- Agiyaon Bazar, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajkishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-07-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Bikramganj P.S.Case 187 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The case is under Section 392 of the IPC and it appears that on confession of the coaccused, he has been made accused. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered, not put on T.I.P. and he is in custody for about seven months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32469 of 2017 (2) dt.14-07-2017 2/2 circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M., Bikramganj, District- Rohtas in connection with Bikramganj P.S.Case No.187 of 2016. With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(iv) If his active participation in such type of cases is found in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U