← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18192/2023dismissed

Babloo Singh @ Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-05Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18192 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-362 Year-2022 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Babloo Singh @ Chandan Singh @ Chandan Kumar Singh S/O Late Nawal Singh @ Nawal Kishor Singh R/V- Kapoor Pakri, P.S.- Shikarganj, DistrictEast Champaran ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Madhurendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kalyan Shankar. APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 05-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner, in the present case, is seeking prearrest bail in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 362 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201/34 of Indian Penal Code. He has no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph '3' of the application. Allegation against the petitioner (husband) is of killing the daughter of the of informant due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that on the alleged day of occurrence the deceased was seriously ill and on the way of hospital she died.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18192 of 2023(2) dt.05-06-2023 2/2 Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, wherein the allegation is that the victim lady was killed by strangulation and her dead body was disposed of, under the fact that the victim was killed in her matrimonial home while living with the petitioner, who is husband of the deceased, this Court, would not be inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is, thus,refused.

Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will surrender within a period of four weeks. Let the petitioner surrender in the learned court below and pray for regular bail which will be considered on it's own merit by the learned court below without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Manoj/- U T