Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14187 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-346 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Aman Kumar S/o Sri Vinod Rai R/o vill - Barua, P.s.- Rajapakar (Baranti O.P.), Distt.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Th\akur, Adv.

Mr. Purushottam Kumar, Adv.

Ms. Kajal, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lalan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 346 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections-61 and 103(1) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioner alongwith two others called the son of the deceased for some necessary work. It is further alleged that the deceased was administered poison by intoxicating article and similarly, he was killed and his dead body was thrown in canal.

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that from perusal of the case diary, it will transpire that in this case, the police received information that on 03-10-2025 one Chandan Kumar has died. The inquest report was prepared and dead body was sent for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14187 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026 2/2 postmortem but the family members of the deceased have not given any statement nor any FIR was lodged on 03-10-2025 and the case was lodged on 04-10-2025. It has also been submitted that the case was lodged after inquest and postmortem. It has further been submitted that save and except the statement of the informant that the petitioner had called the deceased for some necessary work, there is nothing against him and from perusal of the postmortem report also, it transpires that the doctor in autopsy has not found any ante-mortem injury on the person of the deceased and that is why, the viscera was preserved.

5. Learned APP has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 346 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) A.K.V.//- U T