Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14798/2025bail granted

Ganesh Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-28Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14798 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2025 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Ganesh Prasad Yadav S/O Late Dindayal Yadav Resident of village - Madhepura Biharkhi, ward ward no.- 21, P.S- Madhepura, DistrictMadhepura Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate Mrs. Diksha Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 90/2025 dated 21.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 4335.48 litres of illicit foreign liquor was recovered from the godown and from the house of the petitioner. Further, two cartoons illicit foreign liquor were recovered from the two cars parked outside the godown.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14798 of 2025(2) dt.28-03-2025 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. As per para. 16 of the bail petition, the petitioner is not the owner of the said vehicles. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 90/2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T