← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7924/2021disposed

Sanjiv Kumar Majhi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-04Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad,Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7924 of 2021 ====================================================== Sanjiv Kumar Majhi, aged 33 years (Male) Son of Motilal Majhi, Resident of Village-Mirjapur, P.S. - Barauli, District -Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principle Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

3.

Sub-divisional Magistrate, Gopalganj.

4.

Charanjeet Kumar, aged 27 years, (Male) Son of Rama Shankar Ram, Resident of Village-Salona, P.O. - Sonbarsha, P.S. - Barauli, DistrictGopalganj. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, Adv.

For the Respondents :

Mr.Lalit Kishore AG ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 04-02-2022 This matter has been taken up for hearing online because of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions.

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by action of the respondents in denying him license to run PDS shop under the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 (for short 'the Control Order, 2016') for Sonbarsa Gram Panchayat in the District of Gopalganj and, selection of respondent no.4 for the said purpose.

3. It is an admitted legal position that the petitioner has

Patna High Court CWJC No.7924 of 2021(2) dt.04-02-2022 2/2 remedy under the provisions of Control Order, 2016 by way of approaching appropriate/statutory authority to raise his grievance in relation to selection in a question.

4. In such view of the matter, this application is disposed of with an observation that if the petitioner approaches competent authority under the provisions of the Control Order, 2016, within four weeks from today raising the grievance as has been raised in the present writ application, his representation/application shall be considered expeditiously and decided, as early as possible, preferably within three months from the date of presentation of the application/representation. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U