Ravindra Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.34171 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -54 Year- 2017 Thana -MOHIUDDIN NAGAR DistrictSAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Ravindra Rai Son of Late Bhulan Rai, Resident of Village-Mahmadiur, Police Station-Mohiuddin Nagar, District Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghunandan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Mohiuddin Nagar P.S.Case No.54 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 376 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing rape of the informant, who is a minor girl.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case as he is a Driver of Tractor and he demanded his wages. He was also assaulted and made accused in this case. There is counter case also and the petitioner has received several injuries also. Now he is in custody for four months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34171 of 2017 (3) dt.07-08-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of counter case and further injuries received by the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge-I-cum-Special Judge (POSCO Act), Samastipur, in connection with Mohiuddin Nagar P.S.Case No.54 of 2017 (G.R.No.1040 of 2017) dated 14.4.2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T