← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7070/2016disposed

Ram Babu Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-12-22Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7070 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Ram Babu Rai Son of Late Jhum Lal Rai 2.

Jai Prakesh Kumar alias Mallik Rai son of Sri Ram Babu Rai, Resident of Village Lodipur Chakwara, at, P.S. Hijipur and District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Collector, Vaishali at Hajipur 2.

The Superintendent of Police, Vaishali at Hajipur. 3.

The Station House Officer, Hajipur Town Police Station, Hajipur 4.

The Anchalaldhikari, Hajipur 5.

Jainath Rai 6.

Jagarnath Rai, both sons of Late Mahanth Bhaliram Das 7.

Harendra Rai Son of Shiv Deyal Rai, 8.

Jai Krit Rai Son of Late Bijaendra Rai all resident of Mohalla- Ram Bhadra, P.S.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali.

9.

Chandradeo Rai Son of Late Parmeshwar Rai 10.

Binda Rai 11.

Sundar Rai 12.

Bansi Rai all sons of Late Chanirika Rai, residents of Village- Terasia, P.S Ganga Bridge, District- Vaishali.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kr. Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Bhola Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ravi Shankar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Abbas Haider, SC 16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This writ application has been filed for directing the Anchaladhikari, Hajipur (Respondent No. 4) to mutate the name of the petitioners and further for direction to the private respondents not to disturb the peaceful possession of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.7070 of 2016(2) dt.22-12-2023 2/2 petitioners.

3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners requests for disposal of the writ application granting liberty to the petitioners to file fresh representation before the appropriate authority in accordance with law.

4. In view of the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioners, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh representation before the appropriate forum as may be available to them in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from today.

5. In the event such representation is filed within the stipulated time, the authority concerned is directed to dispose of the same in accordance with law after hearing the parties, preferably, within a period of six months from the date of filing of such representation.

6. Writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observations.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U