Guddu Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24934 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2016 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== GUDDU SINGH Son of sRaj Kishore Singh Resident of village - Srirampur, thuthi, P.S.- Parbatta, Distt.- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.PK Shahi, Senior Advocate and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. KR Ranjan, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was refused by this Court vide order dated 6.7.2020, passed in Cr.Misc.No. 14622/2020.
From perusal of the trial court's report dated 10.8.2021 it appears that the case is still at the stage of prosecution evidence and even after lapse of more than a year since the last order, there is no progress in the trial. Petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2016.
Considering the period of incarceration of the petitioner and progress of the trial, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24934 of 2021(4) dt.22-09-2021 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge V, Khagaria/Presiding officer, FTC I, Khagaria in Parbatta Police Station Case No. 296 of 2016 on the following conditions:-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T