Nand Kishore Vishwakarma @ Nand Vishwakarma @ Nand Kishor Vishawakaram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17157 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Nand Kishore Vishwakarma @ Nand Vishwakarma @ Nand Kishor Vishawakaram Son of Rameshwar Vishwaarma Resident of Village- Panchar, P.S.-Rafiganj, District-Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Gauri Shankar Gupta For the State :
Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Aurangabad (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341/323/376 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. I have gone through the case dairy.
4. F.I.R. against the unknown was registered on the statement of the victim for committing rape. During investigation, police came to know that a criminal had tried to rape with a number of women but he could not succeed but he used to snatch the mobile phone of those females. The mobile looted from the victim Sangeeta Devi has been found to be in possession of the petitioner. In the examination of dump data of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17157 of 2025(2) dt.16-04-2025 2/2 mobile tower, the mobile phone number of the petitioner was found at the time of occurrence. The mobile phone of Sangeeta Devi which was being used by the petitioner has also been recovered from the petitioner. This petitioner has tried to commit rape with a number of females but could not succeed and has committed rape with the informant. He is in jail since 15.07.2024.
5. This application is dismissed.
6. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T