← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4921/2019dismissed

Sunil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-03-29Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4921 of 2019 ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Singh, son of Moti Lal Singh, resident of Village- Haridaspur, P.O.- Khudru Hardaspur, P.S.- Kochas, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Joint Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Deputy Secretary, Home (Police Deptt.), Govt. of Bihar, Patna 4.

District Magistrate, Bhojpur, Ara 5.

District Magistrate, Buxar 6.

Superintendent of Police, Bhojpur, Ara 7.

Additional Collector, Bhojpur, Ara 8.

Additional Collector, Buxar 9.

Sub-Divisional Officer, Buxar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamlesh Prasad Yadav, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sheo Shankar Prasad ( SC-8 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 29-03-2019 The petitioner has approached this Court for payment of ex-gratia amount of Rs. 50,000/- because of the death of his grand-father in the year 1998 while serving as Chaukidar and for his appointment on compassionate ground.

2. Till date, the prayer of the petitioner has not been acceded to for the reason that the records of the service of the grand-father of the petitioner is not available.

Patna High Court CWJC No.4921 of 2019 dt.29-03-2019 2/2

3. The averments made in the writ petition indicate that because the District of Bhojpur was bifurcated in two administrative units/districts viz. Arah and Buxar, the records of the service of the petitioner's grand-father is not to be found.

4. This is no explanation so far as the State is concerned.

5. However, the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner appears to be highly stale even with respect to the ex-gratia payment as it is being claimed because of the death of the grand-father of the petitioner which took place a long time ago.

6. This Court sees no reason to interfere in the matter.

7. The writ petition stands dismissed.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) Shageer/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 02/04/2019 Transmission Date