Chandan Kumar Paswan And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32974 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -250 Year- 2017 Thana -DEHRI TOWN District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Chandan Kumar Paswan.

2. Guddu Kumar, Both Sons of Ram Pravesh Paswan, Resident of VillageBhaluadi, P.S.- Dehri (Indrapuri), Disrict- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Dehri (T) (Indrapuri) P.S.Case No.250 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 186, 189, 353, 323, 341, 504, 506, 332, 333, 224, 225, 307 & 34 of 2017 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of assaulting the police officials when they had gone for arrest of one co-accused in connection with another case.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that at best, the allegation against the petitioners is of assisting the main accused and there is no allegation of assault against these

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32974 of 2017 (3) dt.31-07-2017 2/2 petitioners. They are in custody for about 3 1⁄2 months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dehri, DistrictRohtas in connection with Dehri (T) (Indrapuri) P.S.Case No.250 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, otherwise, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T