Ram Nirikshan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.681 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24610 of 2018 ====================================================== Ram Nirikshan Singh Son of Dasharath Singh Resident of MohallaHanumant Nagar, Laxmipur, P.O., P.S.- and Disrtict- Siwan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Registrar, Rabindra Singh, Jai Prakash University, Chapra, DistrictChapra. 4.

Jai Prakash University, Chapra, through its Registrar, Rabindra Singh District-Chapra.

5.

The Vice-Chancellor, Harikesh Singh Jai Prakash University, Chapra. 6.

B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur through its Registrar, Ajay Kumar Rai, District-Muzaffarpur.

7.

The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Ajay Kumar Rai, DistrictMuzaffarpur. 8.

The Vice-Chancellor, raj Kumar Mandal, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shubh Narain Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Jha (GP-27) Mr.Mukund Mohan Jha, AC to GP-27 For the JPV :

Ms.Vagisha Pragya Vacaknavi, Adv.

For the BRABihar Univ. :

Mr.Indrajeet, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 27-09-2024

1. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the opposite parties that in compliance of the order of this Court dated 06.11.2019, passed in C.W.J.C. No.24610 of 2018, the opposite party-Jai Prakash University, Chapra, has already paid the entire amount, outstanding and payable, qua the petitioner

Patna High Court MJC No.681 of 2020(7) dt.27-09-2024 2/2 herein, hence the order of this Court has stood complied with.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case of any subsisting grievances, the petitioner be granted liberty to approach the opposite parties. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The present contempt petition stands dismissed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U