Patna High CourtMJC/919/2015dismissed

Baliram Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-03-16Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.919 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10500 of 2010 ====================================================== Baliram Singh son of Ranjit Singh, resident of Village- Madhopur, Police Station- Gaunaha, District- West Champaran, Bettiah .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Byas Muni Pradhan son of name not known to the petitioner at present working as Additional Collector, West Champaran, Bettiah

3. Sri Istiyar Ahmad son of name not known to the petitioner at present working as Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Narkatiaganj, West Champaran, Bettiah

4. Sri Kaushal Kishore Singh son of name not known to the petitioner at present working as Circle Officer, Gaunaha Block, West Champaran, Bettiah

5. Anand Kishore Singh son of Ramchandra Singh

6. Ramchandra Singh son of Thakur Singh Both residents of Village- Madhopur, Police Station- Gaunaha, DistrictWest Champaran, Bettiah

7. Usha Kumari @ Usha Devi wife of Ravindra Singh resident Chaturbhujawa, Police Station- Shikarpur, District- West Champaran, Bettiah, at present residing at Village- Madhopur, Police StationGaunaha, District-West Champaran, Bettiah .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None.

For the Respondent/s : Mr. K.K. Singh, AC to SC 10. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-03-2018 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

However, learned counsel for the State is present and submits that, vide Annexure -C to the show cause, the Jamabandi which has been created in favour of the other persons in violation of the order passed by this Court has since been withdrawn vide order dated 19.09.2016, now no case of contempt is made out.

Patna High Court MJC No.919 of 2015 (4) dt.16-03-2018 2/2 In view of the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and that the Jamabandi, which is alleged to be contemptuous, has since been withdrawn, the application has now become infructuous.

It is, dismissed as infructuous.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U