Ravindra Kumar Kharga @ Ravindra Kharga @ Indal Kharga @ Suraj Kharga @ Suraj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 34008 of 2017 Arising out of P.S. Case No.-50 Year-2017 Thana- BIRPUR DistrictSupaul =============================================== Ravindra Kumar Kharga @ Ravindra Kharga @ Indal Kharga @ Suraj Kharga @ Suraj Kumar Yadav, Son of Babunand Kharga,, Resident of Village- Hridyanagar, Police Station- Birpur, District- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s =============================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s:

Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr. Gautam, APP =============================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 20-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for offences under Section 41 (1)(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

It is contended that as per allegation, 20 bottles of 180 ml, 45 bottles of 300 ml and 630 bottles of 300 ml of Nepali wine were recovered from the house of the petitioner. It is further contended that the petitioner is in custody since 10.03.2017. Considering the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, abovenamed is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Supaul in connection with S.T. Excise No. 146/17 arising out of Birpur P.S. Case No. 146

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34008 of 2017() dt.20-07-2017 2/2 of 2017 with a condition that if the petitioner, after his release in this case, is again found to be involved in criminal case of similar nature, the court concerned would be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.

In view of the antecedent of the petitioner, he would be required to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Supaul within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every month thereafter for the next six months. The conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in the aforesaid period by the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned which should be granted by the Superintendent of Police concerned upon his appearance. ( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Vikash/- U T