← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/682/2020disposed

Gopal Prasad, v. The State Of Bihar

2026-05-07Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.682 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.624 of 2019 ====================================================== Gopal Prasad, Son of Late Pashupati Nath Verma, Resident of VillageKhoajpur, P.S. Baligaon, District- Vaishali at present residing at Krishna Nagar, Town and PS and District- Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education department, Government of Bihar, Patna Sri R.K. Mahajan.

2.

Sri Giriwar Dayal Singh, the Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Sushil Kumar Singh, the Director Administration cum Addl. Secretary, Education department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

Sri Kameshwar Kamati, The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Magadh Division, Gaya.

5.

Sri Sanjay Kumar Chaudhary, District Education officer, Nawada. 6.

Mr. Mustafa Hussain Mansoori, District Education Officer, Gaya. 7.

Mr. Md. Alim, District Education Officer, Aurangabad. 8.

Sri Mithilesh Kumar, District Programme Officer (Establishment), Aurangabad.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bajarangi Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Jha (Gp 27) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s) "for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 26.09.2019 passed in CWJC No.624 of

Patna High Court MJC No.682 of 2020(3) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 2019."

3. Learned State counsel submits that a reasoned order has been passed by the Regional Deputy Director, Education, Magadh Division, Gaya vide memo no. 511 dated 09.07.2024 by which the claim of the petitioner has been rejected.

4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U