Rampravesh Chauhan v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4590 of 2026 ====================================================== Rampravesh Chauhan Son of Late Ramvriksh Chauhan @ Late Ramvriksh Prasad, Resident of Village- Kanhaiyaganj, Post Rukhai, Police Station Chandi, District Nalanda. (Late Ramvriksh Prasad Designation - Driver, Retired in the year- 1999, Dhanbad Division) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Labour and Employment Ministry, Government of India, New Delhi.

2.

The Secretary, Labour and Employment Ministry, Government of India, New Delhi 3.

The Central Provident Fund Commissioner, New Delhi. 4.

The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Principal Secretary, Transport Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 6.

The Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, through its Administrator, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.

7.

The Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.

8.

The Chief Account Officer, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation, Birchand Patel Marg, Patna.

9.

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, EPF Office, R. Block, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dinesh Maharaj For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vivekanand Singh, AC to GP-18 Mr. Rajesh Prasad Choudhary Dr. Anand Kumar Ms. Kamya Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to GP-18 for the State, learned counsel for the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation and learned counsel for the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Patna.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.4590 of 2026(2) dt.09-04-2026 2/2 petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a representation before respondent no. 8 for redressal of his grievances.

3. Permission is granted with liberty as prayed for.

4. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before respondent no. 8 for adjudication of his grievances, if so required.

(Ajit Kumar, J) shikha/- U