Suman Kumar, v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4449 of 2022 ====================================================== Suman Kumar, Son of Krityanand Thakur, Resident of Village-Hanuman Nagar, P.O.-Chandaur, P.S. Saur Bazar, District-Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Commissioner Koshi Division, Saharsa.

5.

The District Magistrate, Saharsa.

6.

The District Education Officer, Saharsa.

7.

The District Programme Officer Establishment, Saharsa. 8.

The Block Development Officer, Sonbarsa Raj, District Saharsa. 9.

The Block Education Officer, Sonbarsa Raj, District Saharsa. 10.

The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Shahpur P.S. - Sonbarsa Raj, District Saharsa.

11.

The Panchayat Secretary-cum-Member Secretary Panchayat Niyojan Unit Gram Panchayat Shahpur, P.S. Sonbarsa Raj, District-Saharsa. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amarnath Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Kameshwar Kumar ( Gp 17 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file an application before the District Appellate Authority.

3. Permission is granted.

Patna High Court CWJC No.4449 of 2022(3) dt.10-02-2025 2/2

4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner is directed to file an application before the District Appellate Authority within a period of thirty days and the District Appellate Authority is directed to dispose of the same, in accordance with law, after hearing the parties, by a reasoned and speaking order, within a period of six months thereafter.

5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ application stands disposed of.

6. It goes without saying that if any question of limitation arises before the District Appellate Authority, the same shall be considered, taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the issue before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U