← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14116/2025bail granted

Firoj Ansari @ Firoj Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-13Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14116 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Firoj Ansari @ Firoj Hussain S/o Naushad @ Naushad Hussain Resident of village- Lahan Dhaka, P.S.- Dhaka, Distt.- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 329(3), 324(4), 326(g), 109, 132, 221, 121(1), 121(2) and 61(2) of BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 18.07.2024 at 02:00 PM, an information was received that four labourers died on account of suffocation in a toilet tank while working on a construction site, on account of which the family members and the villagers became furious after the death was confirmed in the hospital leading to violent reacts.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR and his name transpired

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14116 of 2025(3) dt.13-05-2025 2/2 during the course of investigation based on CCTV footage, it is submitted that petitioner is a resident of a place nearby to the place of occurrence, as such, he out of inquisitiveness went to the place of occurrence as ruckus was being created and came to be implicated when petitioner admittedly is a person with clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 303 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T