Rajiv Ranjan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.402 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17204 of 2021 ====================================================== Rajiv Ranjan Singh Son of Prabhunath Singh Resident of Gur ki Mandi Chouraha, Sher Shah Road, Police Station Alamganj, District-Patna-800007, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secreray, Road, Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Patna800015. 2.
The General Manager (G.M), East Central Railway (E.C.R.), Hajipur, Vaishali (Bihar), Pin-844101.
3.
The Chairman, BIhar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Limited (B.R.P.N.N.L),7, Sardar Patel Marg, Veerchand Patel Road Area, Patna-800001. 4.
The District Magistrate (D.M.), District-Gaya, Collectorate, Gaya (Bihar), Pin Code-823001.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Birendra Kumar, Advocate Mrs.Shweta Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Anshuman Singh, CGC Mr.Amit Prakash (Ga 13) Mr.Prabhakar Thakur, AC to GA 13 For the BRPNNL :
Dr.Anand Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 12-07-2023 The present MJC-contempt petition is filed for noncompliance of the orders of this Court dated 04.10.2021.
2. The petitioner is stated to have approached the respondents. Taking note of orders of this Court dated 04.10.2021 passed in CWJC No. 17204 of 2021, the concerned respondent has passed a speaking order on 06.07.2023, and it
Patna High Court MJC No.402 of 2022(4) dt.12-07-2023 2/2 has been placed on record through supplementary show-cause notice and produced as Annexure-8.
3. Perusal of the same, the present MJC-contempt petition does not survive for consideration. However, the concerned railway authorities are hereby directed to take note of the fact that the compliance order is highly belated by years together and it is not appreciable.
4. Therefore, the present contempt petition stands dropped. Subject to payment of cost of ₹5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only). Cost shall be remitted by the respondents on the ground of delay in compliance of the Court orders, cost shall be remitted within a period of four weeks'.
(P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Jitendra Kumar, J) abhishekkr/- U