Rajesh Sada v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35713 of 2017 ====================================================== Rajesh Sada, son of Late Rajendra Sada, R/o Village- Babhangawa, P.S.- Khagaria (Gangore), District- Khagaria.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Khagaria Town (Gangore) P.S.Case No. 407 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-B)(a), 26 & 35 of the Arms Act. Petitioner is named in the FIR and the case is under Sections 399, 402 of IPC and Arms Act.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from his possession and he has falsely been implicated in this case having clean antecedent and he has remained in custody for about two months.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35713 of 2017 (2) dt.08-08-2017 2/2 the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, in connection with Khagaria Town (Gangore) P.S.Case No. 407 of 2017, G.R.No. 1704 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(iv) If active involvement of the petitioner is found in such type of cases in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U