Soudi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14441 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2023 Thana- HALSI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Soudi Yadav Son of Jaleshwar Yadav Resident of Village- Saluja, P.S.- Halsi, Distt.- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Perused the case diary.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 79 of 2023 instituted for the offences under Sections 341/323/324/307/379/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, the accusation against the petitioner is that he in connivance with the other accused persons assaulted the Informant, his brother and his father due to which they sustained injuries.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14441 of 2025(5) dt.15-05-2025 2/3 due to village politics and enmity. There is no specific or direct allegation of any overt act against the petitioner rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. There is an admitted land dispute between the parties. Both the parties are co-villagers. He further submits that so far as injury upon Chandan Yadav is concerned, there is only one injury which is grievous, caused by hard and blunt substance. The injury sustained by the injured Sonu Kumar is simple in nature. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents and is languishing in judicial custody since 18.10.2024 without any rhymes or reason. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case.
5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner, stating that the offence alleged is serious in nature.
6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail, after framing of charge if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 79 of 2023,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14441 of 2025(5) dt.15-05-2025 3/3 subject to the following conditions;
(i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T