Sri Ram Pravesh Ram v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.14639 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -231 Year- 2015 Thana -RAJPUR District- BUXAR ======================================================
1. Sri Ram Pravesh Ram Son of Sri Ram Badan Ram Circle Inspector-cumWheat Purchase Canter Incharge, Bharakhara, Police Station -Rajpur, District Buxar, Resident of Village- Mudki, Post office and Police Station - Darigaon,District Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Prabhu Das, District Manager, Bihar State Food & Civil Supplies Corporation, Buxar Son of late Kumar Ram Resident of Village- Konouli, Po Rani Sagar, PS Sahpur, District Bhojpur Ara. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Nirmala Kumari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Rajpur P.S. Case No. 231 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 406,420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner was Incharge of paddy purchase Center of Rajpur, Bharakhara in the district of Buxar. It is alleged that he misappropriated paddy worth Rs. 1, 08, 30,773.80/-. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there were two other persons working with him at the purchase centre and liability if any, is equally on each of the three. He has
submitted that intentionally, name of other two persons have not been mentioned in the First Information Report as accused. However, after some argument learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application. This application is permitted to be withdrawn with a direction to the petitioner to appear before the Court below within four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If he does so, his application for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by rejection of the present application for grant of anticipatory bail.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U