Md. Hasan @ Hasan Ali v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14061 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2025 Thana- BARARI District- Katihar ====================================================== Md. Hasan @ Hasan Ali S/O Md. Mumtaz R/O Vill.- Tiktikipara, P.S- Barai, Dist- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhola Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Madhuri Lata, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 12-03-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Barari P.S. Case no. 306 of 2025 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 117(2), 109, 85, 352, 351(2), 3(5) and 103(1) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein who happens to be the father-inlaw of the deceased tortured the daughter of the informant for dowry and ultimately she was done to death. The informant states that on having received information and reaching his daughter's place it transpired that the accused had taken his
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14061 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 2/3 daughter for treatment to the Medical College at Katihar.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case only for the reason of his being the father-in-law of the deceased. The allegation of demand of dowry and torture are all false and concocted. The allegations are general and omnibus in nature. Referring to the order of the learned trial Court, it is submitted that the husband of the deceased is in custody and his application for bail was rejected by the same order by which the application for bail of this petitioner was rejected. The petitioner is in custody since 29.9.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.
5. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R., the material that has transpired in course of investigation as is evident from the order of the learned trial Court, the petitioner being in custody for over 5 months since 29.9.2025, not having any criminal antecedent and charge sheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Barari P.S. Case no. 306 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14061 of 2026(2) dt.12-03-2026 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Katihar.
(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U T