Dablu Kahar @ Rajneesh Kumar Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.878 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-632 Year-2018 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Dablu Kahar @ Rajneesh Kumar Ranjan S/o Chunnu Kahar @ Chunnu Lal Resident of Mohalla- Ambedkar Nagar Ward No.-25, P.S. and DisttJehanabad. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Mukesh Kumar No.1, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sadanand Paswan, SPP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-09-2020 This matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 11.02.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jehanabad, in connection with S.T. No.93 of 2018, arising out of Jehanabad Police Station Case No.632 of 2018 registered under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.878 of 2020(2) dt.04-09-2020 2/3 It appears that some other co-accused have been allowed bail by different coordinate Benches of this Court having identical allegation. The appellant is in custody since 09.08.2018.

In the past prayer for bail to the appellant was refused by this Court by order dated 20.12.2018 with direction to the learned trial Judge to expedite and conclude the trial. The impugned order passed by the learned Courtbelow reveals that the trial has not concluded as yet. Considering the facts of this case aforesaid, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The appellant shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.

(c) The appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.878 of 2020(2) dt.04-09-2020 3/3 Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T