← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4157/2023disposed

Umesh Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-01Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4157 of 2023 ====================================================== Umesh Prasad Son of Late Bangali Ram, Resident of Mohalla-Guljar Bagh near Hanuman Mandir Chowk (Block Road), Rajgir, Police Station-Rajgir in the district of Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director-in-Chief (Disease Control), Public Health Para Medical), Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Additional Director-cum-State Program Officer (Leprosy), Health Building Sultanganj, Patna, Bihar.

5.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Nalanda. 6.

The Civil Surgeon cum Chief Medical Officer, Nalanda. 7.

The Additional Chief Medical Officer-cum-District Program Officer (Leprosy), Nalanda.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar Yadav, SC- 18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 01-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State 2.

Petitioner has made his application before the Additional Director-cum-State Program Officer (Leprosy), Health Building Sultanganj, Patna, Bihar (respondent No. 4) for grant of benefits under the Assured Career Progression Scheme. It is his grievance that the same is not being considered. 3.

In view of the limited grievance, and decision

Patna High Court CWJC No.4157 of 2023(2) dt.01-09-2023 2/2 required to be taken by the respondent No. 4, pendency of the writ petition would serve no useful purpose. The writ petition, therefore is disposed of with a direction to respondent No. 4, to take a final decision and if dues are found admissible, the same should be paid.

4.

The entire exercise is required to be completed within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Raj kishore/- U