← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4158/2025disposed

Nand Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-21Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4158 of 2025 ====================================================== Nand Kumar Singh Son of Late Kailash Singh, Resident of village Beladhi P.S. Daudnagar District Aurangabad (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Aurangabad. 2.

Sub-Divisional Officer, Daudnagar Aurangabad. 3.

Deputy Collector land Reforms Daudnagar, Aurangabad. 4.

Circle Officer, Daudnagar, Aurangabad.

5.

Brij Kishore Singh Son of Late Kameshwar Singh, Resident of Village Beladhi P.O. Terari P.S. Daudnagar District Aurangabad (Bihar). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar Pandey, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Government Pleader-27.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-03-2025 In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- i) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 08.08.2024 passed in Land Dispute Case No.09 of 2023-24 by learned Deputy Collector, Land Reforms Daudnagar, Aurangabad (Respondent No.2) by which learned Court below dismissed the case of the appellant without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case.

ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities to take appropriate action against the private respondent who forcibly possessed the house of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after some

Patna High Court CWJC No.4158 of 2025(2) dt.21-03-2025 2/2 argument submits that this case may be disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to file appeal before the appropriate authority.

3. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioner.

4. In view of the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U