Kedar Singh @ Kedar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35917 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2017 Thana -SINGHIYA District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== Kedar Singh @ Kedar Jha, S/o Ramavtar Singh @ Ramavtar Jha, Resident of Village Imlichowk, Hasanpur, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narsingh Tanti ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Singhia P.S.Case No. 84 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(A), 38(1) (2) and 41(1) of Bihar Excise Act.

As per FIR there is recovery of 43 litres of liquor. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 26.5.2017 having clean antecedent. Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35917 of 2017 (2) dt.09-08-2017 2/2 twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional District and Sessions Judge-VI, Samastipur, in connection with Singhia P.S.Case No. 84 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U