Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14095 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2024 Thana- BIKRAMGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Kumar Singh S/O Raj Kishor Singh R/O Village - Jarlahi Mathiya, P.S- Bikaramganj, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Khusbu Kumari W/O Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Kumar Singh R/O Village - Jarlahi Mathiya, P.S- Bikaramganj, District- Rohtas. At present- R/O Vill.- Mathurapur, P.S- Baghaila, Dist.- Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State and the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 355 of 2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 341, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the D.P. Act.

3. It is a case of matrimonial dispute.

4. Vide order dated 19.04.2025, the matter was referred to the Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The report of the learned Mediator shows that the matter could not be resolved between the parties and therefore, the mediation failed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14095 of 2025(5) dt.11-11-2025 2/3

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. The allegation is general and omnibus. He has submitted further that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 8,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2 (informant).

6. On the other hand, the learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 has opposed the prayer for bail.

7. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, especially the fact that the petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 8,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No. 355 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

8. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 8,000/- per month as interim maintenance to opposite party no. 2 (the informant). The interim maintenance will be subject to any other order granted by any other Court of competent

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14095 of 2025(5) dt.11-11-2025 3/3 jurisdiction granting maintenance to Opposite Party No. 2 (the informant).

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T