Patna High CourtCWJC/5983/2016disposed

Kumar Jay And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-04-05Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.5983 of 2016 (2) dt.05-04-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5983 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Kumar Jay, son of Rameshwar Mahto, resident of village Vardih, P.O. Sikandra, P.S. Sikandra, District Jamui

2. Kumar Alok Ranjan, son of Gauri Shakar Singh, resident of village Chandanpura, P.O. Jamalpur, P.S. Jamalpur, District Munger

3. Naveen Kumar, son of Narayan Prasad, resident of Ward no.10, D.B.Road, Near Khadi Bhandar, P.O. Saharsa, P.S. Saharsa, District Saharsa

4. Sushma Kumari, wife of Rakesh Singh, resident of village Mai, P.O. Mai, P.S. Hilsa, Distric Nalanda

5. Md. Aslam, son of Md. Hafiz Kalam, resident of village Darigaon, P.S. Sasaram, District Rohtas .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, General Administration and Public Grievances Department, Bihar, Patna

2. The Bihar Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, 15 Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna- 800001

3. The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, 15 Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna- 800001

4. The Examination Controller, Bihar Public Service Commission, 15 Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Bailey Road, Patna- 800001 .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Indradeo Prasad, SC-27 For the BPSC : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 05-04-2018 None appears on behalf of the petitioners.

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, learned counsel, appears for the Bihar Public Service Commission to inform that the relief so prayed has been rendered infructuous, inasmuch as not only the examination concerned has been held but the result was also published and now the interview process is going to be held. In view of the submission so made, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Jyoti Saran, J) Surendra/- U