Shambhu Kumar Chaubey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6556 of 2015 ====================================================== Shambhu Kumar Chaubey son of Sri Ramashray Chaubey resident of VillageBarauli, Chaubey Tola, P.O. and P.S.- Barauli, District- Gopalganj Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Secretary, Rural Engineering Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Engineer in Chief-Cum-Additional Commission-Cum-Special Secretary, Rural Engineering Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.
The Chief Engineer-III, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Circle, Circle Siwan. 6.
The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Gopalganj-I. 7.
M/s Durga Construction, At and P.O. Rajeev Nagar, P.S. Gopalganj, Distt. Gopalganj.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Rakesh Kumar. Advocate For the Respondents :
Mr. AC to GA11 For Respondent No.7 :
Mr. Y.V. Giri, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashish Giri, Ms. Riya Giri, Mr. Devashish Giri, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-12-2022 Heard the parties.
The petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(I) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the Order contained in Memo No. 3676 dated 31.03.2015 (Annexure-6) issued under the signatures of Engineer in Chief -Cum-Additional Commission-Cum-Special Secretary, Rural Engineering Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna whereby the Registration of Petitioner being Registration
Patna High Court CWJC No.6556 of 2015(4) dt.22-12-2022 2/2 No.1307/2014 Class-I, stands cancelled.
(II) For any other relief/reliefs, order/orders and direction/directions may be issued in favour of the Petitioner in accordance with law for which he is entitled too in the ends of justice."
I have heard the parties and perused the materials available on record. From paragraph 15 of the counter affidavit it appears that the petitioner has submitted a false affidavit in Form - 'Ka' by disclosing the fact that the petitioner-firm was already taken over by a Company having its own registration. In view of the aforesaid fact, registration of the petitioner being Registration No.1307/2014 has been cancelled by the authority of the Department.
This application is dismissed as the petitioner has suppressed the facts.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) BT/- U