Hari Shankar Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35723 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2015 Thana -PURANHIA District- SHEOHAR ======================================================

1. Hari Shankar Sah, Son of Late Siya Ram Sah,

2. Vineet Sah, Son of Lakhandeo Sah,

3. Sanjay Sah Son of Shyam Narayan Sah, All R/o Village- Hathsar, P.S.- Purnahiya in the District of Sheohar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-08-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Purnahiya P.S.Case No.91 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners and other accused persons is of assaulting the deceased causing his death. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that nothing specific has been attributed against any of the petitioners and the petitioners and other accused persons are five in numbers, whereas the postmortem report shows that only one injury has been found and one of the co-accused has already been

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35723 of 2017 (2) dt.09-08-2017 2/3 acquitted by the learned trial court after completion of trial and the petitioners are in custody for above and round 3 1⁄2 months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Sheohar in connection with Purnahiya P.S.Case No.91 of 2015.

The learned trial court is also directed to expedite the trial of the petitioners as one of the co-accused has already been acquitted by the learned trial court and try to conclude the trial of the petitioners within a period of nine months.

At the same time, the petitioners shall also co-operate in disposal of the trial and they shall also present on each and every date and they will not be absent without showing any genuine reasons.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35723 of 2017 (2) dt.09-08-2017 3/3 U