Naresh Yadav @ Naro Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1041 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2015 Thana -SHEIKHOPUR SARAI District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Naresh Yadav @ Naro Yadav Son of Late Amrit Yadav Resident of Village - Premchand Bigha, Police Station -Shekhopur Sarai, District - Shekhpura. .... .... Appellant

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Amin Kumar, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binoy Krishna, SPL P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2017 The appellant seeks bail in connection with Shekhopur Sarai P.S. Case No. 34/2015 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3(R) (S) of the SC/ST Act.

The allegation against the appellant is that on 24.05.2015, he along with his wife demanded Ra. 3,000/- from son of informant namely Sajo Paswan and also threatened him of the dire consequences upon non-payment of the same. They also took away Sajo Paswan and further, the said Sajo Paswan was found dead.

It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that he is innocent and has not committed any offence. It is further

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1041 of 2017 (6) dt.10-07-2017 2/2 submitted that the deceased was going to Delhi with one Dabloo Paswan but his train was missed and he return to his home and on the way, due to over-drunk, he fell down on the earth and died. Having heard both sides.

In view of the fact and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. However, considering the fact that appellant is in custody for about 5 months, learned Spl.Judge is directed to conclude the trial within a period of 6 months. At the same time S.P. Sheikhpura is directed to ensure the attendance of the witnesses in the trial court on the date fixed so that the trial can be conclude expeditiously. With the above observation, this appeal is dismissed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) veena/- U