Savitri Devi @ Shyamvati Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16360 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2025 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Savitri Devi @ Shyamvati Devi Wife of Lalo Rai Resident Of Village - Keota Kagpur PS- Dalsing Sarai District- Samastipur 2.

Manita Kumari @ Mangita Kumari Daughter of Lalo Rai Resident Of Village - Keota Kagpur PS- Dalsing Sarai District- Samastipur 3.

Sangita Kumari Daughter of Lalo Rai Resident Of Village - Keota Kagpur P.S- Dalsing Sarai District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners, apprehending their arrest, in connection with Dalsingh Sarai P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025 dated 10.06.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023.

3. As per allegation, there was altercation between the informant and the accused persons and as per further allegation, the accused persons, including the petitioners, administered poison to the informant.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16360 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is no symptom of administration of poison to the informant. As a matter of fact, the informant was suffering from dysentery. He also submits that compromise has taken place between the informant and the accused persons settling their family disputes.

5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail petition that the petitioners have not moved this Court earlier either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

7. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the Petitioners for bail.

8. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioners above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Concerned Court below, in connection

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16360 of 2026(2) dt.25-03-2026 3/3 with Dalsingh Sarai P.S. Case No. 205 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) B.N.S.S., 2023 and on the following conditions:

(i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedents, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents despite their knowledge of the same.

(ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong, learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) shoaib/- U T