Yamuna Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32797 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -229 Year- 2015 Thana -LAXMIPUR District- JAMUI ====================================================== Yamuna Das, son of Vijay Das, resident of Sabal Bichala Tola, Police Station- Laxmipur, District- Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 19.09.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32112 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 10.09.2016 after his surrender in the court below, co-accused Awan Kumar @ Awan Kumar Das @ Gore has been allowed bail by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.04.2016 in Cr. Misc. No. 14984 of 2016 and further other co-accused, namely, Sakal Dev @ Sakal Deo Das has been allowed pre-arrest bail by order dated 09.01.2017 in Cr. Misc. No. 44527 of 2016 and as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration, to which the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32797 of 2017 (2) dt.16-08-2017 2/2 learned A.P.P. opposes by submitting that the petitioner has caused injury in the abdomen and the nature of the injury has been found dangerous to life caused by firearm.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner, again prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with S.T. No. 42 of 2017 arising out of Laxmipur P.S. Case No. 229 of 2015 pending in the court of A.D.J. 2nd, Jamui. However, considering detention of the petitioner, let the trial be expedited and concluded as early as possible preferably within a period of six months, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T