Pawan Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32063 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2017 Thana -SONBERSA District- SAHARSA ======================================================

1. Pawan Sharma Son of Umesh Sharma, Resident of Village- Bhada, PostJalsima, P.s.- Sonbarsa Raj, District- Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Surendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sonbarsa Raj P.S. Case No. 14 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner's name has surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against him. It has further been submitted that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and uptil now no Test Identification Parade has been conducted and he has been in judicial custody since 30.05.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that petitioner's name transpired on this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and except that there is nothing against the petitioner, let the petitioner above named, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32063 of 2017 (3) dt.25-07-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Sonbarsa Raj P.S. Case No. 14 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T