Geeta Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32844 of 2017 (3) dt.07-08-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32844 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -91 Year- 2017 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Geeta Devi, Wife of Late Upendra Chaudhary, Resident of VillageRajwar Tola Toli, P.S. Boadhgaya and D/o Firangi Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Bajaura Tola, Mistritand, P.S. Dobhi, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2017 The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 91 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is the wife of the deceased and allegation against her is that he along with co-accused persons have killed the deceased.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she has been made accused in this case only on the basis of suspicion as she happens to be the wife of the deceased and while she was lamenting near the dead body of the deceased, she was apprehended and except that there is nothing against the petitioner and she has been in judicial custody since Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32844 of 2017 (3) dt.07-08-2017 circumstances of the case and also that petitioner is a lady and has been in judicial custody for last five months, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 91 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T