Satya Narayan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7964 of 2012 =========================================================== Satya Narayan Prasad Son of Late Ramjee Prasad Keshari Resident of Karnamapur, P.S. Sahapur, District - Bhojpur (Ara) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna Old Secretariat, Patna
2. The Regional Manager, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Ara District - Bhojpur, Ara
3. The Branch Manager, Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Karnamepur P.S. Sahpur Distt. Bhojpur, Ara .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiopujan Singh For the Resp. bank : Mr. M.N.Parbat, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Praveen Prabhakar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ravi Shankar Prasad, AC to GP VII =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent bank not to recover the amount of Rs. 3,08,962/- from the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a C.C. Account loan of Rs. 2,50,000/- was sanctioned to the petitioner in the year 2005 but recovery of the due amount is being sought to be made without indicating the rate of interest.
4. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent bank opposes the writ petition, submitting that the same is not maintainable as the
Patna High Court CWJC No.7964 of 2012 dt.05-05-2016 petitioner has approached this Court at the stage of issuance of notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 in respect of which the petitioner has statutory remedy of filing a petition under Section 13(3) A of the said Act.
5. In the above view of the matter, the writ petition is devoid of merit and is dismissed as such.
(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 06.05.2016 Transmission Date