Saday Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14037 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-365 Year-2018 Thana- AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== Saday Kumar Singh (M), aged about 40 years, S/o Anubhuti Nath Singh @ Anubhutinath Singh, R/o Mohalla Karma Road, Aurangabad, P.S.- Town, District- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 365 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 285 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the E.C. Act.

As per prosecution story, an inspection was conducted by the Block Supply Officers and other officials and, from the shop of the petitioner, two filled gas cylinders were recovered.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one gas cylinder was of petitioner and another was of his brother. The allegation has been made of illegal trade of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14037 of 2019(2) dt.07-03-2019 2/2 gas.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 365 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been canceled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T